Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's global score of 80.4. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is way newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it is heavier and just a little bit thicker. Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a more vivid display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit inferior count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video, a much larger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures, higher video frame rate and a way more MP camera in the back.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.