Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, with a score of 89 against 87.1. Samsung Galaxy Note10 is an noticeably older phone than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, but it's lighter and a little bit thinner anyway. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a brighter display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bigger screen.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality and a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note10, because it has 256 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.