Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than Galaxy Note3, having a global score of 87.1 against 77.7. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a lot newer than the Galaxy Note3, it's just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. These phones include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has older 14 version and Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2.
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has an inferior number of cores and 9 GB lesser RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a bigger display and a little better number of pixels per inch in the display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a way bigger aperture, better 60 fps video frame rates, a way bigger sensor shooting way higher quality pictures and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with much more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.