Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit better than Galaxy Note7, with a overall score of 87.1 against 79.5. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is incredibly newer, but heavier and a bit thicker than the Galaxy Note7. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a larger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Galaxy Note7 features a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (but faster).
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a back camera with a much better 50 MP resolution, a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality and better 60 fps video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with superior battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.