Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, getting an 88.3 score against 87.1. Galaxy S10's design is incredibly lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, even though it was released many years before. These devices use Android OS, but Galaxy S10 has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy S10 features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and way less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a much bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 32% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.