Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, getting an 89.7 score against 87.1. Galaxy S10 Lite is an much older phone than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, but Samsung could make it just a bit lighter and just a little thinner. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a better looking display than Galaxy S10 Lite. Both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a same size display and a higher pixel count per display inch. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture and a camera with more megapixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S10 Lite's battery life is just as good as the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.