Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S10e's 86.3 general score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is extremely newer, but a little bit thicker and noticeably heavier than Galaxy S10e. Galaxy S10e counts with a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more vivid display than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a just a bit worse display pixel density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher resolution and a much bigger camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.