Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a global score of 94.8, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 global score. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy S20 is noticeably older than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, it's construction is lighter and a little thinner. These devices come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 has 13 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14.
Galaxy S20 has a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a lot worse display pixel density and a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much larger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography, better video frame rates and a back camera with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S20, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 13 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.