Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE has a score of 90.8, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 overall score. Galaxy S20 FE is an way older device than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, but Samsung was able to make it just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner anyway. These devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 FE has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot better 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and videos and a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S20 FE's battery duration is just as good as Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.