Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Gray, Phantom pink, Violet and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 722.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, getting a 91.8 score against 87.1. Galaxy S21's construction is a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S21 has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 features a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S21, because although it has a little lower amount of pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a really brighter display and a bit bigger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Galaxy S21, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S21, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low light situations, a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much better 50 mega pixels resolution camera and faster video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S21, because it has a 13% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.