Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | -- |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 FE has a score of 89.1, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's score of 87.1. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy S21 FE is way older than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, it's body is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S21 FE has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a brighter display than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a quite lower pixel quantity in each inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little larger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has 384 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE's battery lifetime is just as good as the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra one. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a greater camera than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited environments and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.