Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 9.6 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, with a global score of 93.4 against 87.1. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 has an older 13 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14. Galaxy S22 is an way older cellphone than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, but it's somewhat thinner and lighter anyway.
Galaxy S22 features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy S22 counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has way less brightness, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit better screen pixel density.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S22 shoots a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing lower quality photographs and videos and a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and/or video in low light environments, and they both have a same resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a lot better video definition.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features improved battery life than Galaxy S22, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.