Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-04-16 | -- |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.95 ounces | -- |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | -- |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy S25's global score of 82.6. Both of these devices include the same Android 14 operating system, so they should give the same operating system features. The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher screen density and a bit more brightness.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra and Galaxy S25 have incredibly similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy S25 has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S25, because it has 384 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy S25 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a tinier sensor taking less light and duller colors and a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures in poorly lited environments, and they both have a camera with a 50 MP, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a lot higher video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S25, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.