Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 overall score. Both devices we are comparing include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the previous 14 version and Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is newer and a little thinner, but also heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has 4 less cores (although faster) and less RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit sharper display than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a lot larger display and a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light environments, a camera in the back with much more MP, a lot larger camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality and faster video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.