Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is slightly better than Galaxy S7, having a global score of 87.1 against 79.5. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is a lot newer, but noticeably heavier and a little thicker than Galaxy S7. The Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S7 has a screen that is very similar to the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra one, because although the Samsung Galaxy S7 has a much smaller display and much lower brightness, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a lot bigger camera sensor taking much higher quality pictures and videos, a lot higher resolution back facing camera and higher video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.