Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is better than the Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 general score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is notably newer and thinner than Galaxy S7 Active's, but it is also just a little bit heavier. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a way lower pixels density and a bit worse 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a way larger screen and much more brightness.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although faster). Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a greater camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography, a lot better resolution camera in the back and faster video frame rates.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little better battery duration than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.