Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-04-16 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, getting a score of 87.1 against 78.1. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an older 14 version and Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is way newer than the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, it is incredibly heavier and thicker.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a brighter display than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a lot worse pixel density and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a larger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Galaxy S7 edge counts with a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior camera than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a way larger sensor capturing way higher quality videos and pictures, a larger camera aperture to take better photos in low-light environments, a back facing camera with a much higher 50 MP resolution and higher video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.