Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a bit better than the Galaxy S9, with an 87.1 score against 83.3. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is a lot newer than Galaxy S9's, although it is somewhat heavier and a bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy S9 has a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S9, because although it has a much worse pixels density and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a larger display. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing images or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S9, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.