Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, getting a global score of 92.3 against 87.1. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is an noticeably older cellphone than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, but it's thinner and a bit lighter anyway.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little less pixels per inch of display and a little worse 1080 x 2400px resolution, they both have a display of the same size. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a way larger sensor providing a much higher image quality, a larger camera aperture for better low-light photography and videos and a camera with lot more MP.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.