Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, having a 94.6 score against 87.1. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much older and much heavier than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, it's body is still extremely thinner. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. Both of them have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a brighter display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit better display density.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in low light environments, a lot better resolution camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a battery lifetime that is very similar to the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.