Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is better than Xperia XZs's 77.2 general score. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a lot newer than the Xperia XZs, it's heavier and just a bit thicker. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better display than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Xperia XZs counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser cpu cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Xperia XZs has a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower video definition, a much less megapixels back-facing camera, a smaller aperture which is not good for low light images and videos and a lot tinier back camera sensor. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior battery performance than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.