Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2024-09-26 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a bit better than Xiaomi 14T Pro, getting a overall score of 87.1 against 84.5. Both phones in this review come with the same Android 14 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is a little bit thicker but a bit lighter than the Xiaomi 14T Pro, and they were released only 5 months apart.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro's processor is very similar to Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's processing unit, both of them have the same number of cores and a 12 GB RAM. The Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xiaomi 14T Pro also has a quite higher pixels count in each inch in the screen, a really brighter display and a little higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi 14T Pro, because it has 256 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi 14T Pro has just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have a same resolution camera and a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi 14T Pro also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Xiaomi 14T Pro features just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.