Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-04-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark's 80.4 score. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the previous 14 version and Xiaomi Black Shark has Android 9.0 Pie version. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a noticeably newer and a little thinner phone than Xiaomi Black Shark, although it's a little bit heavier.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a brighter display than Xiaomi Black Shark, because although it has a just a little lower pixels amount per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little bigger screen and much more brightness. The Xiaomi Black Shark features a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has better video frame rates, a way bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a lot higher resolution back camera and a bigger aperture.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.