Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-03-28 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black and Silver |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 2's 82.3 general score. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has Android 10 version, giving some extra features and performance enhancements. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a a lot newer cellphone, and it's also a little bit lighter and a little thinner than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a brighter display than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel number per inch of screen, it also counts with much more brightness, a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a higher resolution camera, higher video frame rate, a bigger aperture for better low light photos and a much bigger sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little longer battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.