Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's overall score of 82.9. These phones include Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the older 14 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is much newer, just a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has a just a bit lower display pixel density, it also counts with way more brightness, a little larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos and a way larger camera sensor.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.