Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, having an 87.1 score against 86.6. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has Android 10, giving some nice extra features and some performance improvements. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is extremely newer, somewhat lighter and thinner than Xiaomi Black Shark 3.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3. Both of them have the same pixels density, an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a screen with the same size. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a much tinier back camera sensor capturing way lower quality videos and images and a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photographs or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also counts with a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a little better battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 4720mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.