Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-05-06 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a global score of 88.3, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's score of 87.1. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, it must be told that it is also extremely older, just a bit heavier and thicker.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, and although they both have the same pixel density, the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a display with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a way brighter display. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a way bigger camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures, a camera with a higher resolution and a larger aperture for better low-light images and video.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra and the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 both feature very similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.