Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 83.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-05-25 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Aurora Blue, Cosmic Gray and Dream White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, having an 87.1 score against 83.6. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version and Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite has Android 10. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is way newer, but just a little thicker and just a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a better display than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, because although it has a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a quite bigger display and much more display brightness.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite counts with a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a camera with more megapixels, a larger aperture, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.