Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-10-01 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.62 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10T has a general score of 87.9, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's score of 87.1. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi 10T has an older 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version. Even being the best we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Mi 10T design is older, just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T features a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T, and although they both have a screen of the same size, exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 and the same count of pixels in each screen inch, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has way more display brightness.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Xiaomi Mi 10T features a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a way smaller back-facing camera sensor taking much worse quality photographs and videos and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.