Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-10-13 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.57 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4820mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite's overall score of 81.2. Both devices we compare here have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has Android 10, so it provides the user some extra features. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a newer phone, and it is also just a little lighter and just a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite. Both of them have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, a greater pixel number in each inch in the screen and a display of the same size.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite features a little longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 7 percent bigger battery size.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior camera than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less MP resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a lot larger camera sensor and a bigger aperture for better low light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.