Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 90 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-10-01 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a global score of 90, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 general score. Even being the best in our current comparison, it must be noted that it's also a noticeably older, a little bit thicker and just a little heavier cellphone. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has the previous 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a better display than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, and although they both have a greater amount of pixels per screen inch, a display with the same size and the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has way more brightness.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features a much better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and a tinier sensor capturing worse quality videos and photographs, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro counts with a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.