Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 75.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.80 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue, Gold and Red |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2244 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3120mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is better than Xiaomi Mi 8 SE's global score of 75.9. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with Android 14 OS, while Xiaomi Mi 8 SE comes with Android OS. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a lot newer than Xiaomi Mi 8 SE, it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker.
Xiaomi Mi 8 SE features an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a brighter screen than Xiaomi Mi 8 SE, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen, way more display brightness and a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 8 SE, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a greater camera than Xiaomi Mi 8 SE, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a way bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a bigger aperture, higher video frame rates and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 8 SE, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3120mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.