Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's global score of 81.4. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is way newer, but notably heavier and somewhat thicker than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE. These phones have Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the older 14 version while Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has a just a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit larger screen, much more brightness and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 47 percent greater battery size. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger aperture for better low light photos, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a camera with a better 50 MP resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.