Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Metal and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 9T's overall score of 82.2. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10, providing the user a lot of extra features and performance enhancements. Even though Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a little heavier than the Xiaomi Mi 9T, it's a bit thinner and also a lot newer.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has a little bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a way brighter screen, a bit bigger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. Xiaomi Mi 9T has a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes slightly better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography in poorly lited situations, higher 60 fps video frame rates, a higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.