Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's 82.7 global score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a much newer and a bit thinner phone than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, although it is also a little heavier. These phones have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10, so it gives a lot of extra features.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels amount in each display inch, it also counts with way more brightness, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little larger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light situations, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much better quality photographs and a higher resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has just a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 13% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.