Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-07-27 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.25 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue, Gold, Pink and Red |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3010mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Xiaomi Mi A2, having a global score of 87.1 against 78. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is incredibly newer than the Xiaomi Mi A2's, but it is somewhat thicker and heavier. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi A2, because although it has a little bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi A2 counts with a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi A2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has higher video frame rates, a much bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a larger camera aperture.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a really longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3010mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.