Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Blue, Gray and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi A3, getting an 87.1 score against 79.2. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version and Xiaomi Mi A3 has Android 11 version, providing you some extra features and improved performance. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is a lot newer than Xiaomi Mi A3's, but it's somewhat heavier and just a little thicker.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little larger screen and a greater display pixel density. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 has a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes a little bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a camera with a higher resolution, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light situations.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4030mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.