Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2016-05-17 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than Xiaomi Mi Max, with an 87.1 score against 77.5. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is newer and just a little lighter than Xiaomi Mi Max's, but it is somewhat thicker. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way better screen than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a little bit better pixel density, a little bigger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Xiaomi Mi Max features a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes a lot better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Max, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot higher resolution back facing camera, faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a larger aperture.
The Xiaomi Mi Max features just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has an 8% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.