Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, having an 87.1 score against 77.5. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is thicker than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, it's just a bit lighter and notably newer. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features an incredibly better display than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a quite bigger screen, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little more pixels per screen inch.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a much bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in low light situations, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor and a much more MP camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has improved battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.