Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-10-10 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.98 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 614.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2's 81.2 general score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a a lot newer device than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, but it is a little heavier and somewhat thicker. The Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit larger display. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures way better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images in poorly lited situations, higher video frame rates, a camera with much more MP and a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much bigger memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because it has 256 GB more internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.