Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's 84.3 score. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra design is somewhat lighter but extremely thicker than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, and they were released with only 3 months difference. Both devices we compare here come with the same Android 14 operating system, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding operating system features.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has just a bit better screen than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a little greater pixels count in each inch in the display, a little brighter screen, a bigger display and a lot higher 2224 x 2488 resolution. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra feature really similar processing units, both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a smaller sensor and a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photography and videos, and they both have a camera in the back with a 50 mega-pixels resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5100mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.