Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-05-09 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, getting an 87.1 score against 80.6. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has Android 11, giving you a couple additional features and a performance increase. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra design is way newer, thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better display than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel quantity in each screen inch, it also counts with way more brightness, a little bigger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has a camera in the back with a way worse 50 mega pixels resolution and a lower (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with greater battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.