Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-04-16 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black and Silver |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, getting an 87.1 score against 76. Even though Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is extremely newer than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has older 14 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a quite greater pixels density and a larger screen. Xiaomi Mi Note 2 features a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 4 less CPU cores (although faster) and lesser RAM.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes way better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a way more MP camera in the back, a bigger aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited environments and a lot bigger camera sensor.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.