Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-03-13 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a bit better than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, with a overall score of 87.1 against 80.5. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is newer, but a little thicker and a little bit heavier than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro. Both phones we are comparing come with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and Xiaomi Note 7 Pro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Xiaomi Note 7 Pro counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a brighter screen than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because although it has a just a little lower pixels amount per screen inch, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a camera in the back with more megapixels, a larger diafragm aperture, a lot bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photographs and videos and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little longer battery performance than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.