Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 global score. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version. Even being the best in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro design is a lot older, heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same pixel density, a same size screen and the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot brighter screen. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a way tinier back camera sensor giving a much lower image quality and a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way better video quality and a much better 64 MP resolution camera in the back.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.