Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-07-14 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, getting a overall score of 87.1 against 78.7. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is way newer, just a little thinner and just a little lighter than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10 version, so it counts with lots of additional features and performance improvements.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro. Both have a greater pixels count per inch of screen, the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution and a screen of the same size.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger aperture, better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a more megapixels camera in the back. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a little longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.