Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than Xiaomi Poco M3, getting an 87.1 score against 78.2. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a newer cellphone, and it's also just a little bit lighter and thinner than Xiaomi Poco M3. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and Xiaomi Poco M3 has Android 10, counting with a couple nice extra features and performance improvements.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with an incredibly better display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots better photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better images and videos in low-light situations, a camera with more megapixels, a lot bigger sensor and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with better battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.