Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T's 78.2 general score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is a lot newer, a little lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10, so it provides you lots of additional features and some performance improvements.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a little bit inferior pixels count in each screen inch, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Xiaomi Redmi 9T features better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 33 percent greater battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a better camera than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a back camera with a higher 50 mega-pixels resolution, a bigger camera aperture, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way higher (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.