Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 12.32 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, with an 87.1 score against 78.3. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is notably newer, but just a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. These phones work with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has Android 11 version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has a little lower pixel quantity per inch of display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with much more brightness and a bit larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because it has a bigger aperture, a camera in the back with more mega pixels and a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.