Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-04-28 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 12.32 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, having a general score of 87.1 against 78.2. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has Android 11 version, providing the user some additional features. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a newer device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it's a bit thicker and a bit heavier.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a just a bit worse screen density, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a little larger display and a lot brighter display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with just a little better battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots greater photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a camera with much less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.